Which is worse:Day 2

Ante wrote:Cannibalism in a non-survival situation is disgustingly disrespectful to the victim/corpse/person.

Incest is a strange fetish, but as long as both people consent there's nothing wrong about it.

imo

Frostbyrn wrote:Thought this would be a more even competition

Rectal Tenesmus wrote:I disagree, as cannibalism, while is wrong when done outside the context of necessity for survival (remember how people survived after their plane crashed in the Alps), at least provides a means of staying alive. Also, we are not the only species that has been observed to eat our own. Food is food.

Terry Corp. wrote:incest leads to inbreeding though. you cant have inbreeding without incest.

How else do you think it happens?

Ante wrote:

Terry Corp. wrote:incest leads to inbreeding though. you cant have inbreeding without incest.

How else do you think it happens?

...what? You can have sexual relations with a relative without reproduction.

Terry Corp. wrote:

Ante wrote:

Terry Corp. wrote:incest leads to inbreeding though. you cant have inbreeding without incest.

How else do you think it happens?

...what? You can have sexual relations with a relative without reproduction.

I know, i think you are reading what I wrote backwards. Not saying that you can't have sex without reproduction.

Ante wrote:

Terry Corp. wrote:

Ante wrote:

Terry Corp. wrote:incest leads to inbreeding though. you cant have inbreeding without incest.

How else do you think it happens?

...what? You can have sexual relations with a relative without reproduction.

I know, i think you are reading what I wrote backwards. Not saying that you can't have sex without reproduction.

Pretty sure I read and understood it clearly, unless you worded something wrongly.


You state it as though if there is incest, there will always be inbreeding, which is not true. You can't have inbreeding without incest, but you can have incest without inbreeding. If two siblings/relatives want to get it on and make sure to use proper protection, I don't see how there's anything wrong with that. Condemning something because it could possibly lead to a negative outcome just seems.... backwards to me. It's like condemning the use of firearms in general because it's possible to use them to commit murder. Maybe a little extreme, but the jist of it is clear. It's all about responsibility.

It seems you're thinking this in black and white, when like most things it's a grey area.


That being said, inbreeding is not good. You risk a life of ridicule for the child, and humanity as a whole is degraded by it.

Sym wrote:I voted incest! And Im the onl;y one.

Cannibalism to me can be used as a survival tactic, and has saved lives before.

Incest is just gross to me lol.


Both still pretty gnarly though...

Frostbyrn wrote:Did you read the part where it isnt a survival situation and you are just munching on people for fun or the taste

Ante wrote:

Sym wrote:I voted incest! And Im the onl;y one.

Cannibalism to me can be used as a survival tactic, and has saved lives before.

Incest is just gross to me lol.


Both still pretty gnarly though...

This was in a non-survival situation though. Desecrating a corpse in such a way for no good reason is a pretty detached and insane thing to do.

Ante wrote:

Sym wrote:I voted incest! And Im the onl;y one.

Cannibalism to me can be used as a survival tactic, and has saved lives before.

Incest is just gross to me lol.


Both still pretty gnarly though...

This was in a non-survival situation though. Desecrating a corpse in such a way for no good reason is a pretty detached and insane thing to do.

Sym wrote:Incest is just getting your jollies off with your family.

The Adli Corporation wrote:

Sym wrote:Incest is just getting your jollies off with your family.

...

hang on one mo.

Pariah wrote:Personally I could never consent to either, but I have to pick incest here. Having a little sister and being as uber protective as I am, that idea is doubly horrifying to me.

Frostbyrn wrote:

The Adli Corporation wrote:

Sym wrote:Incest is just getting your jollies off with your family.

...

hang on one mo.

Didnt you get your sister to do that elbow thing lol

The Adli Corporation wrote:
no, he said that in order for inbreeding to happen, there must be incest, it is a tautology. you cannot inbreed without incest.
but you can be incest without inbreeding, if you use contraception, etc.

The Adli Corporation wrote:

Frostbyrn wrote:

The Adli Corporation wrote:

Sym wrote:Incest is just getting your jollies off with your family.

...

hang on one mo.

Didnt you get your sister to do that elbow thing lol

she can bend her elbows backwards, not the elbow thing

Terry Corp. wrote:

The Adli Corporation wrote:
no, he said that in order for inbreeding to happen, there must be incest, it is a tautology. you cannot inbreed without incest.
but you can be incest without inbreeding, if you use contraception, etc.

thank you adli, I couldn't have said it better.