Anyone picking up this title on the Xbox? 1200 points.
Pretty solid game, had a lot of fun with it so far.
Pretty solid game, had a lot of fun with it so far.
Go to page : 1, 2
It is 13 years old.Metalzoic wrote:Afraid not. I've watched some vids of it, but I just don't get it. Gameplay wise it looks to me like it's 10+ years old.
Metalzoic wrote:Afraid not. I've watched some vids of it, but I just don't get it. Gameplay wise it looks to me like it's 10+ years old.
Khfan60 wrote:Jesus christ randoms are awful at this game.
Mr. Lundegaard wrote:I would imagine a fair number of Xbox gamers have never played a CS game before.
MADEWITHROBOTS wrote:Hmmm.....I'd never played a CS game before, so I was keen to try it out and have played the trial.
I never play with aim assist anyway (provided there's an option to turn it off), so adjusted quickly to the controls and did just fine - but the whole thing just feels really archaic to me.
I still had some fun, and would have liked to have played past the 45min trial period, but I think it's a little overpriced at 1200msp (which seems to be the new standard for Arcade these days) and with Fall Of Cybertron just arriving, as well as Armored Kill and Halo 4 in the wings.....I just don't think CS would be worth my money as I can't see myself playing over those.
It seems, from forums I've read, that most of the people loving this are those who are already invested in CS - and personally I don't really see what the fuss is about.
Like I said, I had fun, but it does feel aged to me. I've always found Valve to be just a bit overrated, and this seems like a very lazy job to me.
I think that, at this point, Tactical Intervention looks a lot more interesting - and at least it's trying to bring something new to the party:
*raises flame shield*
Go to page : 1, 2
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|