Recent Posts
SeC Gaming
the Lounge
New Lounge Topic
New Gaming Topic
We've moved to Discord

You are not connected. Please login or register

U.N. could shut down the internet!

+11
Artimise Flare
Patrick Star
HydrasBreath ♜
MEGA MILK
The Adli Corporation
grader
Frostbyrn
Pariah
Duck
Epyk MD
Green bean Specialist
15 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Green bean Specialist

Green bean Specialist

A U.N. conference that kicked off last week in Dubai has sparked fear of Internet censorship in the U.S. -- something U.S. Ambassador Terry Kramer said he is doing everything in his power to prevent.

Nothing regarding the Internet do we want subject to U.N. review and regulation, Kramer told FoxNews.com.

Monday marked the first day of an 11-day conference. Kramer, who leads the U.S. delegation at the conference, said that the first day had gone well and so far delegates are still in the early stage, talking about what should be reviewed when. No specific regulations have been debated yet.

'[Proposals] ... which would essentially tax the Internet we are actively opposing.

- Terry Kramer, U.S. chief envoy to the ITU


But regulations likely to come up soon are far reaching with signification ramifications, ranging from changes to the way web addresses like ".com" are distributed to charging websites for sending information (for example, a company like Google or Amazon could be required to pay cable companies a charge every time someone used their site.)

COULD SHUT DOWN FOR US, UK AND UN NATIONS! THEY SAY THAT THE INTERNET IS IN TOO MUCH USE OF CONSPRICY !

http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2012/12/03/us-ambassador-were-trying-to-stop-un-from-regulating-internet/#ixzz2E5paOZoq

Epyk MD

Epyk MD

I've been following this a bit.
Such bullshit yo.

Duck

Duck

like the UN is gonna get the US to do anything it doesn't want to do. The US can invade countries that the UN doesn't want it to, what makes them think the US is gonna let them censor their internet?

Pariah

Pariah

I call bullshit. And here's why:

1. The source is Fox News, possibly the most blatantly biased "new source" in all of history (they got out of slander charges one by literally saying that they didn't have to provide facts, seeing as they're a "news-entertainment" channel)

2. The Internet is it's own sovereign territory, one that cannot be ruled by countries. We saw this with Google, they completely flouted international law and suffered no consequences, on multiple occasions.

3. What Duck said, the US can do whatever it wants when it comes to it's own borders.

4. Charging websites by the visit is one of the most blatantly stupid and pointless things that can even be thought up, and I have to hope that one of these political clowns is smart enough to see that.

5. Back to Google. If Google and Amazon decided to stop working for a while, the Internet could quite literally collapse. Websites have died in days after Google stopped showing them on searches (evidence: xenu.com nearly stopped existing when google sided with the CoS against them)

6. The second someone mentioned that this would happen to the common man, we would have complete and total revolution. So much is now entangled in the internet that if anything were to infringe on that, there would be a near-global Jihad.

Frostbyrn

Frostbyrn

Lol no one in this age would risk pissing off google that much

And Fox news isnt that like the Onion?

Speaking of things that are banned did you know Australia banned the show of A-cup tits in porn lol

grader

grader

Frostbyrn wrote:Lol no one in this age would risk pissing off google that much

And Fox news isnt that like the Onion?

Speaking of things that are banned did you know Australia banned the show of A-cup tits in porn lol
Thats not true,is it?

The Adli Corporation

The Adli Corporation

Duck wrote:like the UN is gonna get the US to do anything it doesn't want to do. The US can invade countries that the UN doesn't want it to, what makes them think the US is gonna let them censor their internet?

this.

MEGA MILK

MEGA MILK

Frostbyrn wrote:
Speaking of things that are banned did you know Australia banned the show of A-cup tits in porn lol

why

HydrasBreath ♜

HydrasBreath ♜

MEGA MILK wrote:
Frostbyrn wrote:
Speaking of things that are banned did you know Australia banned the show of A-cup tits in porn lol

why

yeah this makes absolutely no sense. scratch

Patrick Star

Patrick Star

HydrasBreath wrote:
MEGA MILK wrote:
Frostbyrn wrote:
Speaking of things that are banned did you know Australia banned the show of A-cup tits in porn lol

why

yeah this makes absolutely no sense. scratch
Maybe because it looks too much like kitty porn. Just speculation.

Frostbyrn

Frostbyrn

In the eyes of Koala land only Pedophiles like A-Cups

Or A-Cups are like gateway boobs to pedophilia or some shit

The Adli Corporation

The Adli Corporation

Frostbyrn wrote:In the eyes of Koala land only Pedophiles like A-Cups

Or A-Cups are like gateway boobs to pedophilia or some shit

im pretty sure you could argue that banning a-cups from porn is sexual discrimination Razz

Frostbyrn

Frostbyrn

The most serious victim in all this is Kate Hudson Very Happy

Artimise Flare

Artimise Flare

Pariah wrote:I call bullshit. And here's why:

1. The source is Fox News, possibly the most blatantly biased "new source" in all of history (they got out of slander charges one by literally saying that they didn't have to provide facts, seeing as they're a "news-entertainment" channel)


To be the devils advocate, MSNBC is even worse than Fox, while Fox is certainly a right leaning entertainment/news network, they at least bring in the other side in most of there story coverage (Though they tend to flatten them and subdue their opinions) MSNBC doesn't even cover any of that.

Both are opposite extremes here, that's why I tend to listen to foreign news like BBC and others since they have no real stake in what's going on in America, they just report the news. Al Jazeera is actually suprisingly good despite Fox' demonizing of them.

I listen to multiple news networks, MSNBC, CNN and FOX simply because you can't get the full scope on anything these days due to intentional bias' of the respective news networks or papers.

90% of the country of course just gobbles their shit up without actually doing any sort of digging to get facts, then they sound like an idiot when someone who actually does have an idea of the bigger picture comes along and crushes everything they were spoon fed.

Sensationalism sells people, it matters not which network is spewing their parties propaganda. They're all in it to push their own agendas and to make money.

Frostbyrn

Frostbyrn

Wanna see a joke?

A news reporter here did the entire weather in Elvish Very Happy

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/7UhqNt98tsY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Artimise Flare

Artimise Flare

Frostbyrn wrote:Wanna see a joke?

A news reporter here did the entire weather in Elvish Very Happy

If that's true, that's pretty fucking awesome. Nerdism ftw! lol Thumbs up

Frostbyrn

Frostbyrn

Artimise Flare wrote:
Frostbyrn wrote:Wanna see a joke?

A news reporter here did the entire weather in Elvish Very Happy

If that's true, that's pretty fucking awesome. Nerdism ftw! lol U.N. could shut down the internet! 2855922021

Edited the video in for ya Very Happy

Epyk MD

Epyk MD

Frostbyrn wrote:The most serious victim in all this is Kate Hudson Very Happy

she acted preemptively bro,
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/15/kate-hudson-breast-implan_n_538582.html

Frostbyrn

Frostbyrn

This happened awhile ago as well guys I believe

Pariah

Pariah

New Zealand is awesome.


Back on topic Art, yes, MSNBC is extremely biased. They're just as bad as Fox News, Fox is just a lot more blatant about it.

U.N. could shut down the internet! X6syo

Zillah

Zillah

Artimise Flare wrote:
Pariah wrote:I call bullshit. And here's why:

1. The source is Fox News, possibly the most blatantly biased "new source" in all of history (they got out of slander charges one by literally saying that they didn't have to provide facts, seeing as they're a "news-entertainment" channel)


To be the devils advocate, MSNBC is even worse than Fox, while Fox is certainly a right leaning entertainment/news network, they at least bring in the other side in most of there story coverage (Though they tend to flatten them and subdue their opinions) MSNBC doesn't even cover any of that.

Theyre both equally left/right wing, its pointless to say that one is more biased than the other.

Fox news does tend to be.... funnier though.

Ron Swanson

Ron Swanson

there isn't any really viable news networks in the US anymore. maybe cnn but even they can be sketchy sometimes.

Frostbyrn

Frostbyrn

Ferris wrote:there isn't any really viable news networks in the US anymore. maybe cnn but even they can be sketchy sometimes.


U.N. could shut down the internet! H0C0146E0

Pariah

Pariah

I use BBC and Al Jazeera, they work well enough.

Duck

Duck

i use greenbeanspecialist mainly

Frostbyrn

Frostbyrn

Duck wrote:i use greenbeanspecialist mainly

Yeah same here

Metalzoic

Metalzoic

Frostbyrn wrote:
Duck wrote:i use greenbeanspecialist mainly

Yeah same here

Same here.
Who is Greenbean anyway?

Frostbyrn

Frostbyrn

Some say he is a rogue government news robot with a speech impediment and a desire to eat gerbils

But that could just be a rumor

menacinglemon

menacinglemon

Frostbyrn wrote:Some say he is a rogue government news robot with a speech impediment and a desire to eat gerbils

But that could just be a rumor

but we know him as the Stig

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum