Medal of Honor.

*walks out of the lurker hole*

Hello again.

As the time of writing this Medal of Honor comes out tomorrow.

Who is going to get it? If so what are your favorite things about it?

If not may I inquire why?

I for one will play BC2 and Medal of Honor. COEXIST.

*walks back into lurker hole.*

Fast I can still preorder for the next 3 hours should I do it?

I'm not getting it. *puts dynamite in hole*

*puts dirt over hole for good measure*

TAKE THAT FOR GETTING THAT GAME! xD

Thank you Bob lol. And I would rather play mw2 than that game, to be completely honest.

I actually want to see how good/bad MoH is. If they've improved it from the Beta, it may be alright, but something tells me otherwise.

I haven't played the Beta, but I just think the game looks horrible for some reason.

I'm getting it if only for the single player. I always liked the MoH campaigns, and so far it looks very promising in that regard. Multiplayer, not so much, but thats what I got BC2 for.

Tom said that the campaign is only 5 hours long...

Meh, regardless, I'll see for myself, and if anything, I'll just return the game. Can't be as bad as the broken piece of shit that is FFXIV

HAHAHA I haven;t played the game. And now I probably won't lol.

To be fair, it did do some things right, and I hope that square mans the fuck up and decides to put some actuall balls to the stone and fix it. It has so much potential, but it seems like the devs just got up and shit on a piece of paper and made interpretations of the lines in their feces on what would go into the game.

What's so bad about it?

Bla125 wrote:What's so bad about it?

Watch this.
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/review-hd-final-fantasy/705892?type=flv

I watched a couple minutes and heard so many bad things I just stopped watching lol.

Just saw some Beta game play for my first time. Nope. No spread while moving and no recoil. I prefer a tactical modern combat shooter to be more realistic without making things too easy. Long Live BFBC2.

Yeah I played the first beta and it was... horrible. The only redeeming factor is that I'm pretty sure I saw a P90 in one of the trailers. That is my most favorite gun ever and I was pissed when I found out it wasn't an engineer weapon.

My interest in this game was never great. I think I am going to pass.

Im looking forward to it.

Seems to be a great single player. I like the fact that you get to play as an average soldier in it. I always liked those type missions in COD.

I played the first beta and I for one actually enjoyed it. Yeah, there were bugs and wasnt much recoil but wth do you think a beta is there for? That is something that pisses me off about people. Never willing to give something a chance because a TEST phase of it is a little buggy.

Not directed at yall but the people on gamefaqs. Every other thread was someone bitching about it.


The style of gameplay seems to be pretty good. Not as arcady as COD and not as "tactical" as BFBC but a good mix of the 2 and not so vehicle oriented.

I still hear that it sucks and all the guns are like recoiless rail-guns from people that are playing the game as I post now. I also heard spawn camping is a huge issue even though they said they were going to fix it when it was first an issue in Beta. Single player seems good, but I won't even rent it for that.

I have it pre-ordered, but after seeing reviews I'm not going to pick it up.

I feel like the MP for this game will not have the staying power like BC2, and the guys playing this will mostly go over to black ops when it is released. Plus nothing in it ever gave me that WOW factor.

Hmm, based on the reviews do you think it's worth $20?

I have a friend that can get it from the EA store for me, but I wasn't really interested to begin with but I can't pass up a bargain.

For $20! Yes I would buy this game for $20.

Now I'm jealous!

From what I hear, the game is a LOT better than the beta. The hit detection is better, the recoil is nearly perfect, by which you can go full auto and still get the kill, but the person who can control recoil better will still win the fire fight. Spawn camping is still a bit of a problem. There is camping, but it's still easily possible to rush. (This is from what I've heard and seen, I have no experience hands-on.)

For $20 get us all one.

Recoil: is alot LESS in comparison to BC2

Damage: is buffed in comparison to BC2

Perks: there are non NOW everything to aid you is all based on what attachments you put on your weapons.

Lag: apparently its close to what the BC2 servers were pre-patch

UH oh: a friend just texted me asking if i got it YET. I forgot to inform him...

The damage is much more than BC2 because the game was made to be a combination of BC and CoD, in that it's like playing a more fast paced BC.

godscouchpotato wrote:Recoil: is alot LESS in comparison to BC2

Damage: is buffed in comparison to BC2

Perks: there are non NOW everything to aid you is all based on what attachments you put on your weapons.

Lag: apparently its close to what the BC2 servers were pre-patch

UH oh: a friend just texted me asking if i got it YET. I forgot to inform him...

Like I said, the game is like bastard child between CoD and BF games.

Lol Kitsune, I beat you by about 3 seconds xD

Lol, yeah, but we basically said the same thing, but your response was a little nicer than mine. xD

Yeah, but I forgot to mention it has "point streaks". Man I wish I could get this game D:

Yeah, the point streaks vs. kill streaks was the only thing I liked really. I thought that the damage taken was kinda stupid when they try to have a game that fast paced. At least the melee worked.

I also like how you have a choice between helping your team and getting more points, or helping yourself and getting more kills and controlling the battle more effectively.

Yeah, that was one thing I really enjoyed about the Beta, the choice point streaks. It was really nice, but other than the firing sounds, the melee, and that, I really hated it.

How did people get in the beta? I got a code for it, but couldn't access it because it wouldn't let me on the website (and the PC beta was laggy as hell for my computer D:)

You shouldn't be able to go full-auto and get a kill mid to long range. Not a huge fan of killstreaks either. Just my opinion.

Cookie Monster wrote:You shouldn't be able to go full-auto and get a kill mid to long range. Not a huge fan of killstreaks either. Just my opinion.

Chances are if you go full auto at mid-long range, you won't get the kill. Period.

Well the IGN review is predictable, give a shitty review to games with developers who didn't bribe them enough. A 6/10 because of problems that MW2 got a 9/10 for. you can't take their scoring seriously at all, but at least they give some good information.

Seriously, they called the campaign boring because it was scripted and all the enemies came from "that direction" and also the story was bad. That describes CoD just as well. *sigh*

Agreed with you there Duck. Almost ALL games have scripting >_> Except for maybe, L4D