Recent Posts
SeC Gaming
the Lounge
New Lounge Topic
New Gaming Topic
We've moved to Discord

You are not connected. Please login or register

 » The Lounge » Archives » Modern Warfare 3 being built on a new engine - UPDATE: Gameplay trailer

Modern Warfare 3 being built on a new engine - UPDATE: Gameplay trailer

+8
Metalzoic
JrTapia1991
Symbolic
Zillah
Captain Pirate Pineapple
Ars Diaboli
Duck
Ante
12 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Ante

Ante

http://kotaku.com/5804735/the-maker-of-modern-warfare-3-has-moved-beyond-its-modern-warfare-2-tech


This is good news for people who dislike the floaty controls and movements of recent CoD games. AKA EVERYONE.



Last edited by Ante on 2011-05-23, 22:24; edited 1 time in total

Duck

Duck

engine isnt the problem. Its the lack of them changing anything significant...

Ars Diaboli

Ars Diaboli

Well, at least they a bringing SOMETHING new.

Ante

Ante

<iframe width="640" height="390" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/coiTJbr9m04" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


Here's a small gameplay trailer just released. Shows off some of the new environment destruction effects. Nothing close to BC2, but still nice.

Captain Pirate Pineapple

Captain Pirate Pineapple

Ars Diaboli wrote:Well, at least they a bringing SOMETHING new.

Couldn't have said it better. I watched the teaser trailer they just released. Eh, might be interested in playing the campaign, but looks like I'll be skipping over the multiplayer, again. Don't really know if I'll even play the campaign though. I've grown tired of CoD. It's always the same thing over and over. RAMIREZ!

Zillah

Zillah

Ante wrote:<iframe width="640" height="390" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/coiTJbr9m04" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>


Here's a small gameplay trailer just released. Shows off some of the new environment destruction effects. Nothing close to BC2, but still nice.

Will there actually be at least moderately destructible environments in MW3?

Looks almost exactly like MW2 from the trailer tbh.

Ante

Ante

From the trailer it looks like any destruction is scripted. With the way Craptavision forces developers to shovel out games, I doubt IW had time to build a proper destruction engine.

It looks better (graphically) than MW2 to me, but maybe I'm just used to Black Ops (eww gross.)

Symbolic

Symbolic

CoD caters to children. Im sorry but I just cannot stand the.entire community being snot nosed kids and gangsta wannabes.

Zillah

Zillah

Yeah Mw2 definitely had better graphics than blops.

Even though the graphics in battlefield arent as crisp and refined as CoD, theres something about them that I like more. They just seem more "real" so to speak.

Symbolic

Symbolic

The biggest turnoff to me is the gun mechanics, and bullet physics. Also the extreme lack of recoil makes the noobs flock. Plus CoD fanboys are.just the worst.

Zillah

Zillah

Ok, and I know this is a n00by question... but how does the engine of a game affect the gameplay?

I know its like the framework, but how does it actually show?

Ante

Ante

Zillah wrote:Ok, and I know this is a n00by question... but how does the engine of a game affect the gameplay?

I know its like the framework, but how does it actually show?

It affects lighting, physics, movement, everything. If they truly built the engine from the ground up, MW3 won't "feel" like Black Ops and MW2. It may look similar, though.


And I agree about BC2's graphics. While they aren't as good as MW2, BC2's graphics convey information to the player muuuuuch better.



Last edited by Ante on 2011-05-23, 23:29; edited 1 time in total

Ars Diaboli

Ars Diaboli

I'm no expert and I don't really know, but I'm guessing that the engine is akin to a programming language. Depending on how it's designed and its purpose, what you can do with it. So, the programming language (engine in this case) limits what you can and what you can't do, or how easy/hard it is to do some things.

For example, making destructible environments is probably a hell of a lot harder or takes way too many resources to do in CoD's engine than it is in Frostbite 2.0, which is designed with destruction in mind.

Something like that Very Happy Maybe, just guessing.

JrTapia1991

JrTapia1991

I wonder how long before people get tired of buyin the same game every year >__>

Ars Diaboli

Ars Diaboli

I just bought it twice Razz CoD 2 and 4, though they were actually different from each other.

Guest


Guest

Ohhhhhhhhh, yes Call of Duty.


Call of Duty's Campaign has been great. I would get it if the campaign was like Gears of War. Where you can play the whole Campaign by yourself or with a friend.


The multiplayer has WAY to many problems to list. All i have to say is a 12 year old can dominate at this game and not necessarily by skill. The multiplayer is designed very poorly. Every game has noob tactics that anyone can perform. But, Call of Duty masters the noob tactics in game. Call of Duty will always be a game i will rage on.

Metalzoic

Metalzoic

Ante wrote:This is good news for people who dislike the floaty controls and movements of recent CoD games. AKA EVERYONE.

scratch CoD games always feel very crisp and snappy in the control department to me.

It looks good to me.

Frostbyrn

Frostbyrn

Yeah ill probally rent it just to play the Campaign

Metalzoic

Metalzoic

I'll buy it just to run around in MP shooting people.

DRGN LRD 1213

DRGN LRD 1213

HAHA I know most people here are Battlefield fans and CoD haters but it cracks me up. To me Battlefield and CoD are both FPS yes but play entiraly diferent. I like CoD. Its a fast paced fun game. I don't understanmd rage. I get a little frustrated by lag at times but all games have lag.

The more CoD suceeds the more others will try to dethrone it producing bigger and better games.

I love CoD! =o)

Metalzoic

Metalzoic

DRGN LRD 1213 wrote:HAHA I know most people here are Battlefield fans and CoD haters but it cracks me up. To me Battlefield and CoD are both FPS yes but play entiraly diferent. I like CoD. Its a fast paced fun game. I don't understanmd rage. I get a little frustrated by lag at times but all games have lag.

The more CoD suceeds the more others will try to dethrone it producing bigger and better games.

I love CoD! =o)

Word. Very Happy

Frostbyrn

Frostbyrn

DRGN LRD 1213 wrote:HAHA I know most people here are Battlefield fans and CoD haters but it cracks me up. To me Battlefield and CoD are both FPS yes but play entiraly diferent. I like CoD. Its a fast paced fun game. I don't understanmd rage. I get a little frustrated by lag at times but all games have lag.

The more CoD suceeds the more others will try to dethrone it producing bigger and better games.

I love CoD! =o)

I dont really hate CoD itself its not bad IMO and i would play it over other FPS games like Reach

My problem with CoD is its Community and the way it stagnates the market ATM

1fnbighen

1fnbighen

Guest wrote:Ohhhhhhhhh, yes Call of Duty.


Call of Duty's Campaign has been great. I would get it if the campaign was like Gears of War. Where you can play the whole Campaign by yourself or with a friend.


The multiplayer has WAY to many problems to list. All i have to say is a 12 year old can dominate at this game and not necessarily by skill. The multiplayer is designed very poorly. Every game has noob tactics that anyone can perform. But, Call of Duty masters the noob tactics in game. Call of Duty will always be a game i will rage on.

who the dick was this guest?

The Adli Corporation

The Adli Corporation

^ fr0st i think.

Ante

Ante

Blue text, must have been Fr0st.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

 » The Lounge » Archives » Modern Warfare 3 being built on a new engine - UPDATE: Gameplay trailer

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum